
Hendrick gets appeal date from
NASCAR
The National Stock Car
Racing Commission has announced that the appeal hearing
requested by Hendrick Motorsports has been set for Thursday,
Sept. 28. Earlier reports indicated that the hearing would
be the Monday or Tuesday of that week. However, Hendrick and
GM representatives wanted time to prepare their
presentation.
Hendrick Motorsports is
appealing the penalty issued by NASCAR officials following
the win by Jeff Gordon in the Chevrolet Monte Carlo 400 at
Richmond International Raceway on Sept. 9.
The penalty included a
$25,000 fine against crew chief Robbie Loomis, and 100
points docked from driver Jeff Gordon and owner Rick
Hendrick. The penalty was issued for using an unapproved
intake manifold, a piece that was made by GM and had passed
several race inspections.
That is why the appeal was
issued. Because the part had been considered legal for
several months, and because other GM cars must have been
using it. Also, GM thought the part was approved.
However, several crew
members and drivers aren't happy about Hendrick getting to
appeal.
Crew chief Larry McReynolds,
who runs Mike Skinner's team for Richard Childress, says
that NASCAR should have thrown the book at Gordon. ''A rule
is a rule, whether you break it a little or a lot. When you
take points away, that makes a statement that you did
something wrong. Did it help Jeff Gordon win that race?
Probably not. But that carburetor spacer didn't help Mark
Martin win Richmond in 1990.''
Jeff Burton agreed.
''Anything less than taking points away from Jeff would be
wrong,'' Burton said. ''They caught Jack (Roush) with an
intake manifold last year in the truck series, even though
that manifold had been through previous inspections and run
races. But they caught it and said they didn't like it. Just
because it's been through inspection before, doesn't mean
it's legal. ''NASCAR missed it, and they penalized Greg
Biffle, and they penalized Mark Martin, cost both of them
championships, because they took points away. So anything
less than taking points away from Jeff Gordon would be
viewed as being biased. If they don't take points from Jeff,
they will be wrong. ''I don't know if magnesium would make
more horsepower than aluminum,'' Burton said. ''But there
was a reason they wanted to build it out of magnesium rather
than aluminum. It doesn't matter if it was a competitive
advantage, because it was an unapproved part.
''If you're supposed to run
GM Part Number 80624 and it is an aluminum casted intake
manifold, but you run that same part number but it's a
magnesium manifold, then someone has tried to manipulate the
rules. And they've got to be penalized. ''Now I don't think
that intake manifold won the race at Richmond. I believe
what won that race was they had good pit strategy and good
track position and Jeff did a great job of driving the car.
But the only way we can have structure in this garage is
when people do something wrong, you have to penalize them.
If you don't, nobody will ever do anything right.''
|